MERS TKO in Oregon?

Posted by admin on Mar 15, 2011 in My Blog | 878 comments

Several recent decisions by federal judges in Oregon have sent the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) to the mat, bringing foreclosures to a halt.  MERS was created in 1993 to electronically track assignments of mortgages without publicly recording those assignments in the County real property records.  Lenders thereby keep the promissory notes and servicing rights and sell their rights to receive payments under the notes to investors without paying any recording fees.  “Penny wise but pound foolish” my Mom would say.

Central to these recent decisions is ORS 86.735, which provides that a nonjudicial foreclosure by advertisement and sale is permitted in Oregon only if “any assignments of the trust deed by the trustee or the beneficiary and any appointment of a successor trustee are recorded in the mortgage records . . ..”  A trust deed is a three party arrangement between the lender, borrower, and the trustee, who releases the mortgage lien when the loan is paid or conveys title to the lender after foreclosure if the loan is not paid.  Without recording all assignments, a foreclosure cannot go forward.

In the Rinegard-Guirma case, Judge King found that MERS was not really the “beneficiary” (even though labeled as such in the trust deed) because the trust deed was for the benefit of the lender to secure payments under the note, not MERS.  Judge King looked to cases from Oregon and elsewhere which indicate that assignments of the trust deed, without the note, are not effective.  MERS has no authority to transfer the note.  Like Siamese twins joined at birth, the note and trust deed cannot be split – no assignment of trust deed alone is effective.

In Burgett, Judge Hogan stated that unrecorded assignments of trust deeds are permissible, but not if foreclosure by sale is sought.  All prior unrecorded assignments must be filed in a nonjudicial foreclosure by sale.  In McCoy, Bankruptcy Judge Alley made the same findings, while noting that ORS 86.735 does not restrict judicial foreclosures.  There were four separate unrecorded assignments in McCoy as part of a securitized loan pool put together by now defunct Lehman Brothers.

In the Barnett and Eckerson cases, Judge Brown reviewed the prior decisions by Judge Hogan and Judge King and found that foreclosures involving MERS could not proceed.  Homeowners 5, MERS zero.

In Barnett, Judge Brown also found that the lender, BAC, may have breached a loan modification agreement with the borrower.  In a classic case of “dual track” foreclosure, BAC was negotiating a loan modification with the homeowner and at the same time it was pursuing foreclosure. Apparently the left and right hands did not communicate.  Lenders’ computer systems, once programmed for foreclosure, are extremely difficult to override.

All of these decisions — involving restraining orders, injunctions, and motions to dismiss or for summary judgment — are preliminary in nature and do not necessarily mean the lenders will eventually lose.  However, in a few short months Oregon has developed an impressive set of precedents indicating foreclosures involving MERS are suspect.  The lenders may have a very difficult time getting the assignments they need in these cases because several links in the chain of assignments (Lehman, La Salle Bank, Countrywide) are either bankrupt or no longer exist.

Hundreds of foreclosures already in process in Oregon have been rescinded in the past few weeks, because title companies are now excluding the failure to record assignments from title insurance coverage for nonjudicial foreclosures.  Are the lenders likely to regroup and file them as judicial foreclosures?  Probably not, since the filing fees in State Court are hefty, and homeowners and lien holders have a six month period of redemption after any judgment.

So where does that leave us?  Without any legislative solutions, either state or federal, we’re exactly in the same place we’ve been since the mortgage crisis began three years ago – in limbo.

 

878 Responses to “MERS TKO in Oregon?”

  1. Added, I love your blog!

    reply
  2. Bobbi Carey says:

    Thanks for the article.

    reply
  3. It shows how well you understand this subject. Bookmarked this page, thank god someone that someone actually knows what they are talking about – thank you.

    reply
  4. Teaching Quality Discussion says:

    Your post is very interesting. I’ve read your blog for few days now and I trully enjoy your blog. Thank you for your great work!

    reply
  5. dog dog pet family says:

    Terrific, this information is exactly what I was searching for.

    reply
  6. Desiree Rouse says:

    Thanks for your publication. One other thing is that often individual states have their very own laws in which affect home owners, which makes it very difficult for the the legislature to come up with a different set of guidelines concerning foreclosures on house owners. The problem is that a state offers own laws and regulations which may have impact in a damaging manner in terms of foreclosure plans.

    reply
  7. 私家偵探 says:

    I appreciate your site and will subscribe to your rss feed so I can read anytime. Wonderful information!

    reply
  8. Hmm! seems like we share the same point of view.

    reply
  9. 徵信調查 says:

    My sentiments, I will instantly snatch your rss feed to be updated on any upcoming content you may publish, I am really a fan of your post!

    reply
  10. Tomiko Bening says:

    I found it to be pretty hard to receive quality advice on this subject. You have helped me with this posting…

    reply
  11. 私家偵探 says:

    Your page…graphics are charming, and what’s more, you use references that are relevant to what you are saying!

    reply
  12. Doretha Wagar says:

    Nice post. Impressed.

    reply
  13. Douglas Campbell says:

    Impressive write-up!

    reply
  14. Benton Venetos says:

    Finally, a solid internet site that isn’t in my face… Thanks, remember to continue the good work.

    reply
  15. karen millen says:

    Great article. Thank you to tell us more useful information. I am looking forward to reading more of your articles in the future.

    reply
  16. Shaunte Seroka says:

    Very useful info. Hope to see more posts soon!

    reply
  17. Cruz Frisbie says:

    Terrific site. A great deal of usefull info might be found right here. Priceless information. Truly fortunate I discovered your website. I bookmarked it.

    reply

Leave a Reply